ACE 328/Chapter 8

Connectedness

Topological notion of being "in one piece." Connected sets cannot be split into two disjoint nonempty open subsets. Path-connectedness is a stronger, more intuitive form.

Introduction

Connectedness is the topological formalization of the intuition that a space is "all in one piece." Unlike compactness, which is a finiteness property, connectedness is a non-decomposability property: a set is connected if it cannot be split into two disjoint open pieces in a nontrivial way. This chapter develops the theory and its two most important consequences: the classification of connected subsets of R\mathbb{R} as exactly the intervals, and the intermediate value theorem.

We also introduce the related notion of path connectedness -- "any two points can be joined by a curve" -- which is strictly stronger than connectedness. The canonical counterexample, the topologist's sine curve, illustrates how a connected set can nevertheless fail to be path connected. We close with connected components and local connectedness, which describe how arbitrary spaces can be decomposed into maximal connected pieces.


The Definition

DefinitionSeparation and Connected Set

Let XX be a topological space and AXA \subseteq X. A separation of AA is a pair of open sets U,VXU, V \subseteq X such that:

  • AUA \cap U \neq \emptyset and AVA \cap V \neq \emptyset,
  • AUV=A \cap U \cap V = \emptyset,
  • AUVA \subseteq U \cup V.

The set AA is disconnected if a separation exists, and connected otherwise. Equivalently, AA is connected if whenever AUVA \subseteq U \cup V with U,VU, V open in XX, AUV=A \cap U \cap V = \emptyset, and AU,AVA \cap U, A \cap V both nonempty, we have a contradiction.

Remark.

Intuition: Imagine AA is a physical shape, and open sets are regions of a room. AA is disconnected if you can draw two disjoint open regions each containing a piece of AA and together containing all of AA. Then AA visibly splits into "the part in UU" and "the part in VV." Connectedness is the negation: no such split exists, so AA really is one piece. The definition is subtle because UU and VV are open in the ambient space XX; we want them to intersect AA nontrivially but not overlap inside AA. It is equivalent (and often more convenient) to work intrinsically inside AA with its subspace topology, where a separation becomes a pair of nonempty, disjoint, relatively open sets covering AA.

DefinitionIntrinsic Formulation

Equivalently, a topological space AA is connected if the only subsets of AA that are both open and closed (clopen) are \emptyset and AA itself. Indeed, if UAU \subseteq A is clopen with UA\emptyset \neq U \neq A, then {U,AU}\{U, A \setminus U\} is a separation; conversely a separation {AU,AV}\{A \cap U, A \cap V\} consists of two disjoint nonempty relatively open sets that are also closed in AA (each being the complement of the other in AA).

Remark.

Intuition: Clopen sets are the ambiguous sets -- both open and closed. In a connected space the only ambiguous sets are the two trivial ones, \emptyset and the whole space. If a nontrivial clopen set UU existed, it and its complement would form a partition into two open pieces -- a separation. This characterization is often the cleanest one to apply: to prove a space is connected, assume a clopen set UU exists and show it must be all or nothing.

Example

The set A=[0,1][2,3]RA = [0, 1] \cup [2, 3] \subseteq \mathbb{R} is disconnected: take U=(,1.5)U = (-\infty, 1.5) and V=(1.5,)V = (1.5, \infty). Then AU=[0,1]A \cap U = [0, 1], AV=[2,3]A \cap V = [2, 3], both nonempty; AUV=A \cap U \cap V = \emptyset; AUVA \subseteq U \cup V.

Example

The set QR\mathbb{Q} \subseteq \mathbb{R} is disconnected. Take U=(,2)U = (-\infty, \sqrt 2) and V=(2,)V = (\sqrt 2, \infty). Both are open in R\mathbb{R}, together cover Q\mathbb{Q} (since 2Q\sqrt 2 \notin \mathbb{Q}), meet Q\mathbb{Q} nontrivially, and UV=U \cap V = \emptyset. In fact Q\mathbb{Q} is totally disconnected: any subset with more than one point is disconnected by an irrational cut.


Connected Subsets of R\mathbb{R}

The archetypal connected sets are intervals. Recall that an interval is a subset IRI \subseteq \mathbb{R} such that whenever a,bIa, b \in I and a<c<ba < c < b, we have cIc \in I. Intervals include \emptyset, singletons, and the standard types (a,b)(a, b), [a,b][a, b], (a,b](a, b], [a,b)[a, b), (,b)(-\infty, b), [a,)[a, \infty), (,)(-\infty, \infty), and so on.

TheoremIntervals in ℝ Are Connected

Every interval IRI \subseteq \mathbb{R} is connected.

Remark.

Intuition: The proof formalizes the idea that an interval has no gaps. If we tried to split [a,b][a, b] into a piece near aa (in UU) and a piece near bb (in VV), the least upper bound cc of the UU-piece would have to land in one of the two sets, but openness of that set forces the bound to be beatable in a contradictory way. The argument is essentially the intermediate value theorem in disguise, and it uses the least upper bound property of R\mathbb{R} -- the completeness of the real line is really what makes intervals connected.

TheoremConnected Subsets of ℝ Are Intervals

A subset ARA \subseteq \mathbb{R} with at least two points is connected if and only if AA is an interval.

Remark.

Intuition: The connected subsets of R\mathbb{R} are precisely the convex ones -- the intervals. Any "hole" in a set allows us to slide a separating cut through it. This makes R\mathbb{R} a very well-behaved space for connectedness: we have a complete classification. In R2\mathbb{R}^2 the situation is much richer: connected sets can be spirals, comb shapes, or the topologist's sine curve.


Continuous Images of Connected Sets

TheoremContinuous Image of a Connected Set Is Connected

Let X,YX, Y be topological spaces, AXA \subseteq X connected, and f:XYf : X \to Y continuous (on AA). Then f(A)Yf(A) \subseteq Y is connected.

Remark.

Intuition: Continuous functions cannot tear things apart. If they could produce a disconnected image from a connected domain, pulling back the separation would split the domain, contradicting connectedness. This is the topological analogue of the fact that a continuous deformation cannot break a single piece into multiple pieces, and it underlies many existence proofs in analysis.

Disconnectedness via Continuous Maps to

Connectedness can be characterized completely in terms of continuous functions to a two-point discrete space.

TheoremDisconnectedness via Surjections to {0,1}

Let (X,τ)(X, \tau) be a topological space. Then XX is disconnected if and only if there exists a continuous surjective function f:X{0,1}f : X \to \{0, 1\}, where {0,1}R\{0, 1\} \subseteq \mathbb{R} carries the Euclidean topology (equivalently, the discrete topology, since the two agree on a two-point set).

Remark.

Intuition: A continuous surjection f:X{0,1}f : X \to \{0, 1\} is exactly an "indicator function of a clopen set." Such a function exists iff XX has a non-trivial clopen partition, iff XX is disconnected. This is a clean way to detect disconnectedness via a single map.


The Intermediate Value Theorem

TheoremIntermediate Value Theorem

Let f:[a,b]Rf : [a, b] \to \mathbb{R} be continuous and let yy lie between f(a)f(a) and f(b)f(b) (that is, f(a)yf(b)f(a) \le y \le f(b) or f(b)yf(a)f(b) \le y \le f(a)). Then there exists c[a,b]c \in [a, b] with f(c)=yf(c) = y.

Remark.

Intuition: The IVT is perhaps the most famous consequence of connectedness. It says a continuous function cannot skip values: to go from f(a)f(a) to f(b)f(b), the graph must pass through every intermediate value. The proof via connectedness is elegant and conceptual: continuous image of a connected interval is a connected subset of R\mathbb{R}, which is an interval, which contains every point between its endpoints. The usual first-year calculus proof using a bisection argument and the least upper bound property is really just the interval-connectedness proof in disguise.

CorollaryContinuous Functions on Intervals Take Interval Values

If IRI \subseteq \mathbb{R} is any interval and f:IRf : I \to \mathbb{R} is continuous, then f(I)f(I) is an interval.


Unions of Connected Sets

TheoremUnion of Connected Sets with Common Point Is Connected

Let {Aα}αI\{A_\alpha\}_{\alpha \in I} be a family of connected subsets of a topological space XX such that αIAα\bigcap_{\alpha \in I} A_\alpha \neq \emptyset. Then A=αIAαA = \bigcup_{\alpha \in I} A_\alpha is connected.

Remark.

Intuition: A "bouquet" of connected sets pinned together at a common point is still connected. The shared point prevents any separation from splitting the bouquet into two disjoint pieces -- wherever the point goes, each component of the bouquet must go with it (since each AαA_\alpha is connected and contains the point). This is the main tool for building connected sets and is used, for instance, to show path-connected sets are connected.

CorollaryClosure of a Connected Set Is Connected

If AXA \subseteq X is connected then so is any set BB with ABAA \subseteq B \subseteq \overline{A}. In particular, A\overline{A} is connected.

Remark.

Intuition: Adding limit points to a connected set preserves connectedness. This is useful: we can pass from a connected set to its closure without losing the one-piece property. It is why we often define connectedness of sets via the "two relatively open, disjoint, nonempty pieces" formulation -- closures are naturally closed, and closed sets enter the picture when taking unions or limits.


Path Connectedness

DefinitionPath and Path Connected Set

Let XX be a topological space and a,bXa, b \in X. A path from aa to bb is a continuous function γ:[0,1]X\gamma : [0, 1] \to X with γ(0)=a\gamma(0) = a and γ(1)=b\gamma(1) = b. A set AXA \subseteq X is path connected if every pair of points a,bAa, b \in A admits a path γ:[0,1]A\gamma : [0, 1] \to A from aa to bb (i.e. with image in AA).

Remark.

Intuition: Path connectedness is the naive, geometric notion of "in one piece" -- you can walk continuously from any point to any other without leaving the set. This is the condition you typically visualize. It is stronger than connectedness: any path-connected set is connected, but the converse fails, as we will see with the topologist's sine curve.

TheoremPath Connected Implies Connected

Every path connected set AA is connected.

Remark.

Intuition: The proof is the bouquet-at-a-basepoint argument. Each path from pp to aa is a connected set containing pp; the union over all aa is all of AA and is connected because of the shared point pp. Path connectedness is usually easy to check (just exhibit the paths), while connectedness requires ruling out all possible separations. So "path connected implies connected" is often the fastest way to prove connectedness in practice.

Example

Every convex subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n is path connected: for a,ba, b in a convex set AA, the straight-line path γ(t)=(1t)a+tb\gamma(t) = (1 - t)a + tb lies in AA for all t[0,1]t \in [0, 1].

Example

Rn{0}\mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{0\} is path connected for n2n \ge 2: any two points can be joined by a path avoiding the origin (e.g. a straight line if it misses 00; otherwise take a small detour around 00, which exists since in Rn{0}\mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{0\} we have room to maneuver). For n=1n = 1, R{0}\mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\} has two components and is not path connected.

The Topologist's Sine Curve

The most famous example of a connected set that is not path connected is the topologist's sine curve: T={(x,sin(1/x)):x(0,1]}({0}×[1,1])R2.T = \left\{(x, \sin(1/x)) : x \in (0, 1]\right\} \cup \left(\{0\} \times [-1, 1]\right) \subseteq \mathbb{R}^2. Call S={(x,sin(1/x)):x(0,1]}S = \{(x, \sin(1/x)) : x \in (0, 1]\} the oscillating piece and L={0}×[1,1]L = \{0\} \times [-1, 1] the limit segment.

TheoremThe Topologist's Sine Curve Is Connected

The set TT is connected.

TheoremThe Topologist's Sine Curve Is Not Path Connected

The set TT is not path connected: there is no continuous γ:[0,1]T\gamma : [0, 1] \to T with γ(0)=(0,0)\gamma(0) = (0, 0) and γ(1)=(1,sin1)\gamma(1) = (1, \sin 1).

Remark.

Intuition: Any path starting on the limit segment LL and ending on the oscillating piece SS has to pass from LL to SS at some moment ss. At that moment the path's yy-coordinate is confined to a small neighborhood of v(s)v(s) by continuity; but just after ss the path is on SS, where the yy-coordinate oscillates between 1-1 and +1+1 arbitrarily close to the yy-axis because sin(1/x)\sin(1/x) wiggles infinitely fast as x0+x \to 0^+. So the path must jump, contradicting continuity. Connectedness survives the oscillation because LL is in the closure of SS; path connectedness does not, because a path cannot traverse infinitely many oscillations in finite time while its xx-coordinate goes to zero.


Connected Components

Even if a space is not connected, we can decompose it uniquely into maximal connected pieces.

DefinitionConnected Component

Let XX be a topological space and xXx \in X. The connected component of xx, denoted C(x)C(x), is the union of all connected subsets of XX containing xx: C(x)={AX:xA and A is connected}.C(x) = \bigcup\{A \subseteq X : x \in A \text{ and } A \text{ is connected}\}.

TheoremComponents Partition the Space

Let XX be a topological space. (i) For each xXx \in X, C(x)C(x) is the largest connected subset of XX containing xx. (ii) The set {x}\{x\} is connected, so xC(x)x \in C(x). (iii) The connected components partition XX: either C(x)=C(y)C(x) = C(y) or C(x)C(y)=C(x) \cap C(y) = \emptyset. (iv) Each connected component is closed.

Remark.

Intuition: Every topological space decomposes uniquely into its maximal connected pieces -- the components. Each component is closed, but components need not be open (think of the components of Q\mathbb{Q}, which are single points; points are closed in R\mathbb{R} but not open). Local connectedness, introduced next, is the extra condition that guarantees components are open too.

Example

In Q\mathbb{Q}, the connected component of each point is just that point: any subset of Q\mathbb{Q} with two points is disconnected, so the only connected subset containing xQx \in \mathbb{Q} is {x}\{x\}. A space where every component is a single point is called totally disconnected.

Example

In R{0}\mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\}, the components are (,0)(-\infty, 0) and (0,)(0, \infty). Both are open intervals, hence connected, and they partition the space.


Local Connectedness

DefinitionLocally Connected

A topological space XX is locally connected if for every xXx \in X and every open set UU containing xx, there is a connected open set VV with xVUx \in V \subseteq U. Equivalently, XX has a basis of connected open sets.

Remark.

Intuition: Local connectedness says every point has arbitrarily small connected neighborhoods -- zooming in on any point, the neighborhood structure remains connected. This is a property about the local shape of the space, not its global structure. A space can be connected but not locally connected (the topologist's sine curve), or locally connected but not connected (R{0}\mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\}), or both (any convex subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, or any open subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n).

TheoremComponents Are Open in Locally Connected Spaces

If XX is locally connected, then every connected component of XX is open.

Remark.

Intuition: In a locally connected space, components are both open and closed. This matches our geometric intuition: a locally connected space looks like a disjoint union of open pieces (the components), each of which is itself connected. For example, any open subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n is locally connected (because open balls are connected), so its components are open -- this is the familiar fact that an open subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a disjoint union of open connected sets.

Example

The topologist's sine curve TT is connected but not locally connected: near any point (0,y)L(0, y) \in L, every small neighborhood contains infinitely many arcs from SS and a slice of LL, but no connected neighborhood (the arcs are separated from the slice of LL within a small box). So TT is a clean example of a connected, non-locally-connected space.

Example

Any open subset URnU \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n is locally connected, because open balls are (path) connected and form a basis for the topology of Rn\mathbb{R}^n. Consequently, the connected components of an open set in Rn\mathbb{R}^n are themselves open sets.


Summary

Connectedness is the topological non-decomposability condition: a set is connected if it cannot be cut into two disjoint open pieces. The key facts are:

  • Intervals in R\mathbb{R} are exactly the connected subsets with more than one point, and the proof uses the least upper bound property of R\mathbb{R}.
  • Continuous images of connected sets are connected.
  • Intermediate Value Theorem follows immediately: a continuous function on an interval takes every value between any two of its values.
  • Unions of connected sets sharing a common point are connected; closures of connected sets are connected.
  • Path connectedness is a stronger, more geometric notion: path connected implies connected. The topologist's sine curve shows the converse fails.
  • Connected components partition any space into maximal connected pieces; each is closed, and in locally connected spaces, each is also open.

Connectedness is the dual companion of compactness in topology: compactness says a space is "finite enough," connectedness says it is "unified enough." Continuous functions preserve both, and together these two properties underwrite most of the existence theorems in elementary analysis -- a continuous function on a closed bounded interval attains its extreme values (compactness) and takes every intermediate value (connectedness).